Editorial Policy
How facts, videos, rights, translation, and corrections are handled.
This page explains how the site decides what belongs in the guide and what does not. The short version is simple: first-party facts stay separate from community strategy, and unsupported claims do not get dressed up as certainty.
Evidence levels
The site uses a narrow evidence ladder.
- First-party official: Roblox pages, Roblox-hosted thumbnails or icons, and official policy documents. These identify the experience and its public media.
- Source-backed operational reference: community videos that show how a room was played or how a sequence looked in motion. Useful for orientation, not for exact values.
- Site inference: a cautious reading of what the room appears to want from the player. Useful only when the game itself supports the reading.
- Unverified: anything that depends on a claim the site cannot support. These claims are either removed or clearly marked as not yet verified.
The key rule is that evidence level is visible in the text. If something is only strategy, the text says so. If something comes from the game itself, the text says that too. The site avoids blending those categories into one smooth sentence because that is how weak claims become sticky.
Facts versus strategy
The site keeps facts and strategy apart. A fact is something the official experience page, the official media, or the room itself can support. Strategy is a way a player chose to handle the room. Strategy can be helpful, but it does not become a fact just because it looks clean in a video.
That distinction is why the guide never says a community route is the fastest route unless that claim is actually proven. It is also why the site avoids copying a video transcript to simulate certainty. If the site needs to mention a video, it does so by title and author and adds the boundary directly beside it.
Media rights
The site only uses media that fits its rights rules. Roblox official media may be used for identification when the source is clear. YouTube references are limited to public player embeds and thumbnails. The site does not copy full video frames, subtitles, or transcripts.
If a media owner asks for removal, the site should remove the asset or reference rather than argue for retention. If a required media file is missing, the site should fall back to text and say that the file is missing. It should not pretend that the asset still exists.
Translation rules
The English and pt-BR pages are required to match in meaning, scope, and trust level. Translation is not a place to add new claims or quietly trim a warning. If a sentence is uncertain in English, it stays uncertain in Portuguese. If a warning appears in Portuguese, the English version must carry the same warning.
The site prefers natural language over literal translation where literal wording would sound stiff or misleading. But the meaning must stay aligned. A reader should not be able to learn a different level of certainty just by switching locale.
Corrections and freshness
If a page contains a mistake, it should be corrected as soon as the error is verified. If a source disappears, the site should remove or downgrade the claim instead of keeping it for convenience. Freshness here means “still supported,” not “recently edited.”
When the evidence changes, the text should change with it. The site should not preserve an older claim simply because it is tidy. It should also not update text just to create activity. A stable page is better than a busy one.
Community video handling
The two allowed video references on this site are VendoPlus and Ricoko Tutorial & Showcase. They are there to help readers see the game in motion. They are not proof of exact values, current balance, or the best route.
If a video and the live game disagree, the live game wins. If a title sounds stronger than the evidence supports, the title is still only a title. The site does not use a confident title as a substitute for verification.
AI assistance disclosure
The site may be produced with AI assistance, but the final text must still pass the same evidence rules as any other draft. Assistance does not lower the standard for sourcing, translation parity, or correction handling.
If the site ever needs to revise this policy, the revised version should explain what changed and why. The editorial page exists to make the site easier to audit, not to hide how it works.